Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Financial Trends Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

fiscal Trends Paper - Essay ExampleThe trend was a fall before the rise. The same could be observed in the behavior of net income of the company for the same terzetto-year period, that there was a fall and an improvement later on the fall.Net network margin measures the companys profitability performance (Bernstein, 1993) and is computed by dividing net income oer the total revenues. In case of general motors a consistent 0.01 net profit margins were observed for the three year period. This indicates a rather lack of improvement in the companys performance for the departed three years despite the seeming increase in revenues from total sales for 2005 of US$192.6 gazillion to US $207.3 billion for 2006. This means the cost of the company was very high for the company which needs a deeper analysis as shown belowIt would appear the company was still having some mark-ups from revenues, hence it may deduced that it is sell at above is production cost as evidenced by the positive gr oss profit wander from 2004 through 2006. The loss was felt only in 2005 when operating loss showed a rate of negative 0.01 value. This means that the company has higher operating expenses for 2005 compared with 2006 and 2004. Further analysis revealed that 2005 has high selling and administrative expenses in addition to the decline in revues from 2004 to 2005. Over all 2005 operation was a losing year by the company.When the three year ratios above are analyzed in relation to the trends established earlier in the behavior of the revenues and net income, it may be observed that there was big improvement in the degenerate on equity (Meigs and Meigs, 1995) of the company from 2004 to 2006 although there was a deterioration in the return on assets from 0% in 2004 to -1% in 2006. This means that changes made were beneficial to the stockholder and that having too many assets are non necessarily better for the company if it will result to a better return to equity.

No comments:

Post a Comment